更新
This commit is contained in:
110
CLAUDE.md
110
CLAUDE.md
@@ -92,6 +92,116 @@ This is the **GFast UI** project (`gfast-ui`), a Vue 3 admin management system b
|
||||
|
||||
5. **Keep-alive**: Route components can be cached via keep-alive, managed by the `useKeepALiveNames` store.
|
||||
|
||||
## Repository Collaboration Rules
|
||||
|
||||
These rules capture long-term repository preferences confirmed by the user and should be applied in future sessions unless the user explicitly overrides them.
|
||||
|
||||
### Pagination Rules
|
||||
|
||||
- Prefer the project global `pagination` component by default.
|
||||
- Pagination should be fixed and visible as part of the page or dialog layout, not conditionally hidden only because the dataset is small.
|
||||
- In single-page scenarios, the UI should still show total count together with the pagination area.
|
||||
- Avoid designs where pagination only appears after data exceeds one page.
|
||||
|
||||
### Dialog Layout Rules
|
||||
|
||||
- For dialogs that contain searchable tabular data, prefer this structure:
|
||||
1. search area
|
||||
2. table/content area
|
||||
3. pagination area placed under the table inside the dialog body
|
||||
4. footer action buttons
|
||||
- The pagination area should remain visually stable and should not be omitted just because the current result set is small.
|
||||
|
||||
### Theme and Style Rules
|
||||
|
||||
- When functionality and existing theme style conflict, prioritize making the feature clearly visible and usable first.
|
||||
- After ensuring usability, align the implementation with the repository's existing theme and style system as much as possible.
|
||||
- Be cautious about global theme styles that may affect local pagination, dialog, or table layouts.
|
||||
|
||||
### Problem-solving Workflow
|
||||
|
||||
- For repeated UI issues, analyze in this order:
|
||||
1. interface/request data and returned structure
|
||||
2. component logic and render conditions
|
||||
3. theme and style coverage/conflicts
|
||||
4. then decide whether a rewrite is necessary
|
||||
- Do not jump straight to a rewrite before checking interface behavior and style interference.
|
||||
|
||||
### Execution Workflow Rules
|
||||
|
||||
- When modifying a feature, locate it in this order: usage location, component definition, API definition, then at least one similar implementation in the project.
|
||||
- For common UI features such as pagination, dialogs, and tables, align with an existing similar implementation before making changes.
|
||||
- Prefer componentization. If a page or Vue SFC is already large, or a block has a clear independent responsibility, split it into components instead of continuing to extend the same file.
|
||||
- For very long files such as complex page-level `index.vue` files, treat further component splitting as the default direction rather than the exception.
|
||||
- Before editing large files or complex Vue SFCs, first read the target context; if a replacement fails once, do not repeat the same replacement blindly, and instead expand the context or switch to smaller targeted edits.
|
||||
- After UI or interaction changes, verify not only lint status for edited files but also render conditions, interface fields, and possible style impact.
|
||||
- If the same issue is not resolved after one attempt, pause and ask the user before continuing with more speculative changes.
|
||||
- Do not proactively rewrite a component unless the user explicitly asks for a rewrite.
|
||||
- At the start of a new conversation, read `CLAUDE.md` before making changes.
|
||||
- When code changes appear not to take effect, check in this order: compile/HMR status, render conditions, API data, then style overrides.
|
||||
- Turn repeated low-level mistakes into explicit workflow checks and follow those checks in future edits.
|
||||
|
||||
### Componentization and Structure Rules
|
||||
|
||||
- If a view block has an independent responsibility, prefer extracting it into a component instead of keeping it inside a large page file.
|
||||
- When a file is already long, or a new feature would further expand responsibilities, proactively split it into components.
|
||||
- Child components may keep their own local logic when that logic belongs clearly to the child’s responsibility; only shared state and necessary events should stay in the parent.
|
||||
- For complex pages, small-scale components can stay in `component/`, while larger feature areas may be grouped by responsibility in subdirectories.
|
||||
- For very long page files, prefer keeping the parent focused on composition, state orchestration, and data flow, while moving feature UI and local behavior into child components.
|
||||
- When extracting new child components from a large file, move their related local styles with them to avoid continued growth of the parent file.
|
||||
|
||||
### API and Data Handling Rules
|
||||
|
||||
- Follow the project’s common response structure by default, but add moderate component-side compatibility handling when equivalent APIs return slightly inconsistent fields.
|
||||
- For page-level error handling, use global handling by default, but use page-level or silent handling when the interaction requires local control.
|
||||
- Prefer a unified parameter-building entry for request params instead of assembling the same parameters across multiple functions.
|
||||
|
||||
### Form and Interaction Rules
|
||||
|
||||
- Follow the project’s existing form behavior style: required fields should be clearly validated on submit, while avoiding unnecessarily disruptive validation during input.
|
||||
- For shared create/edit forms, initialize, patch, and reset form state through a unified initialization path to avoid stale state.
|
||||
- Search interactions should behave consistently across button click, Enter key, and clear actions, and should reset to the first page by default.
|
||||
|
||||
### Dialog and Selector Rules
|
||||
|
||||
- Dialogs should clear temporary internal state on close by default; any state that needs to persist should be explicitly provided back by the parent.
|
||||
- Selector components should follow a consistent pattern: `v-model` for visibility, a default value prop, and a `confirm` event for returning the selected result.
|
||||
- For temporary selectors and lightweight dialogs, prefer `destroy-on-close`; for more complex stateful forms, decide deliberately rather than applying it blindly.
|
||||
|
||||
### Styling Rules
|
||||
|
||||
- Prefer local scoped style changes first; only modify global theme styles after confirming the issue is truly shared across multiple places.
|
||||
- When overriding Element Plus internals, prefer local `:deep()` overrides before considering global style changes.
|
||||
- Use semantic, area-based class names instead of short or overly generic names.
|
||||
|
||||
### Debugging and Validation Rules
|
||||
|
||||
- Minimal temporary debugging is allowed when necessary, but all temporary debugging code must be removed before final delivery.
|
||||
- Temporary `console` output is acceptable only when debugging is genuinely needed and must be removed before final delivery.
|
||||
- For UI and interaction changes, verify lint, key render conditions, interface fields, and style impact before considering the task complete.
|
||||
|
||||
### Change Scope and Consistency Rules
|
||||
|
||||
- Prefer the smallest necessary change set, but do not pretend a local-only fix is sufficient when the real root cause is elsewhere in the chain.
|
||||
- Only fix nearby issues when they are strongly related to the current task; otherwise ask the user before expanding the scope.
|
||||
- Within the current modification scope, move code toward repository rules when practical, but avoid broad unrelated refactors.
|
||||
|
||||
### Communication and Risk Rules
|
||||
|
||||
- Before changing code, confirm with the user when a change involves a rewrite, global side effects, unclear requirements, or a second attempt that still has not solved the issue.
|
||||
- After changes, explain what changed, why it was changed that way, and any remaining risks or points worth confirming.
|
||||
- When a requirement still depends on a meaningful assumption, ask the user first instead of silently choosing a direction.
|
||||
|
||||
### Repository Memory Rules
|
||||
|
||||
- When collaboration reveals a repeated problem pattern, proactively suggest turning it into an explicit repository rule in `CLAUDE.md`.
|
||||
- Project-specific experience or pitfall notes may be added when they become necessary, but do not expand them prematurely without clear recurring value.
|
||||
|
||||
### Rule Documentation Style
|
||||
|
||||
- Keep long-term repository rules concise and practical.
|
||||
- Prefer short rule lists with a small amount of explanation over overly long documentation.
|
||||
|
||||
## Environment Variables
|
||||
|
||||
- `.env.development` - Development environment settings
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user